05/12  closing prices/ revised 05/16/2022 11:38 GMT  | 05/12   OPEC Basket $112.37  +3.34| 05/13    Mexico Basket (MME)  $106.36  +4.22| 03/31 ▲  Venezuela Basket $88.12  (Estimated OPEC) | 05/13   Brent July BRN00 $111.55  +4.10| 05/13 WTI  Texas Intermediate Jun CL00  $110.49  +4.36 | 05/13   Natural Gas May NGM22  $7.663  -0.076| 05/13 Gasoline Jun RBM22    $3.9578  +0.1661 |  05/13 Heating Oil  Jun  HOK22   $ 3.9212  -0.0051 |  06/13  Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas)  714  +9 | 05/16   USD/MXN Mexican Peso  $20.1013  Live data | 05/16  EUR/USD $1.0430  Live data | 05/16  USD/Bs. (Bolivar)  $4.77050000  |  –        05/12  closing prices/ revised 05/16/2022 11:38 GMT  | 05/12   OPEC Basket $112.37  +3.34| 05/13    Mexico Basket (MME)  $106.36  +4.22| 03/31 ▲  Venezuela Basket $88.12  (Estimated OPEC) | 05/13   Brent July BRN00 $111.55  +4.10| 05/13 WTI  Texas Intermediate Jun CL00  $110.49  +4.36 | 05/13   Natural Gas May NGM22  $7.663  -0.076| 05/13 Gasoline Jun RBM22    $3.9578  +0.1661 |  05/13 Heating Oil  Jun  HOK22   $ 3.9212  -0.0051 |  06/13  Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas)  714  +9 | 05/16   USD/MXN Mexican Peso  $20.1013  Live data | 05/16  EUR/USD $1.0430  Live data | 05/16  USD/Bs. (Bolivar)  $4.77050000  |  –        05/12  closing prices/ revised 05/16/2022 11:38 GMT  | 05/12   OPEC Basket $112.37  +3.34| 05/13    Mexico Basket (MME)  $106.36  +4.22| 03/31 ▲  Venezuela Basket $88.12  (Estimated OPEC) | 05/13   Brent July BRN00 $111.55  +4.10| 05/13 WTI  Texas Intermediate Jun CL00  $110.49  +4.36 | 05/13   Natural Gas May NGM22  $7.663  -0.076| 05/13 Gasoline Jun RBM22    $3.9578  +0.1661 |  05/13 Heating Oil  Jun  HOK22   $ 3.9212  -0.0051 |  06/13  Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas)  714  +9 | 05/16   USD/MXN Mexican Peso  $20.1013  Live data | 05/16  EUR/USD $1.0430  Live data | 05/16  USD/Bs. (Bolivar)  $4.77050000  |  –       

El Salvador Bets on Bitcoin Mania -O’Grady

Bitcoin tellers in El Salvador (CNN)

By Mary Anastasia O’Grady 

Is bitcoin buzz all it takes to stir the animal spirits of hipster investors? Or does a project with the name of the cryptocurrency attached to it also have to make financial and economic sense? El Salvador’s “volcano bond” may one day provide the answer—if it ever comes to market.

Last fall President Nayib Bukele and his team of cryptocurrency experts announced that El Salvador would soon offer a 10-year, $1 billion bitcoin-linked bond. According to the pitch, half the proceeds would be used to build the infrastructure of “Bitcoin City,” powered by low-cost geothermal electricity that could be used to mine bitcoin from a location near the Conchagua volcano. The other half of the money would be used to buy bitcoin. Investors would receive a 6.5% coupon and, after five years, they would participate in the appreciation of bitcoin via a dividend. The proposed bond is supposed to trade on Bitfinex, an exchange not accessible to Americans.

The details of the bond remain uncertain because there is still no prospectus or offering circular. Nevertheless, in February the chief strategy officer for the tech firm handling the offering told The Wall Street Journal that El Salvador already had verbal commitments for $500 million. He expressed confidence that the government’s decision to adopt bitcoin as its legal tender last September would generate the sizzle necessary to raise the rest.

The bond was expected to come to market this month. But on Tuesday Finance Minister Alejandro Zelaya announced that it would be delayed due to unfavorable market conditions. Perhaps that’s an elegant way of saying that once the hype died down, investors did the math and opted out.

Let’s stipulate that bitcoin’s rules-based regime, eliminating central-bank discretion in the creation of money, has value. More broadly, the blockchain technology that cryptocurrencies use to record ownership of an asset on a decentralized ledger is a highly beneficial innovation that goes well beyond the monetary realm

That said, El Salvador’s new law making it mandatory for merchants to accept bitcoin as payment, despite its volatility, reeks of authoritarianism. The government’s Chivo wallet—where Salvadorans who don’t want to hold the bitcoin they are forced to accept can exchange it for a government-issued stablecoin backed by the full faith and credit of El Salvador—would seem to defeat the purpose of using a cryptocurrency to escape central banking.

The nation has resisted. A January survey of small and medium-size businesses by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of El Salvador found that 86% of respondents said they had not made any sales in bitcoin. Not surprisingly, most people don’t want to hold next month’s rent in it or in Mr. Bukele’s fiat digital money.

Mr. Bukele’s bond looks rather unappetizing even for those who wish to speculate on bitcoin or hold it for long-term appreciation.

To start with, El Salvador’s country risk is sky high. Mr. Bukele, who took office almost three years ago, says the country will pay its debts. But markets are not so sure. The 2032 dollar bond was yielding better than 19% last week. In downgrading El Salvador’s long-term foreign-currency default rating to junk last month, FitchRatings noted that “increasing risks from high and growing financing needs” are estimated to reach $5.4 billion, or 18% of gross domestic product, in 2023.

Last week Mr. Zelaya confirmed that the bitcoin bond won’t be issued by the government of El Salvador. Instead, he said, it will be debt of a small geothermal company called LaGeo, a subsidiary of the state-owned electricity company CEL.

Pay no attention to that, Mr. Zelaya insisted. Whether “it is issued by LaGeo or by the Salvadoran state, in the end it is always a debt of the state.” He didn’t mention that with LaGeo as the creditor, El Salvador avoids adding more liabilities to its balance sheet that already has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 85%.

Mr. Zelaya also reaffirmed his expectation that the offering will be oversubscribed. But if the written bond contract, yet to materialize, is the same as the government has verbalized, it’s hard to see the upside for bond investors with licit funds to put to work. They won’t have an equity stake in Bitcoin City, so even if it booms their best outcome remains reliant on the price of the coin and the credibility of the debt issuer.

Investors can bet on bitcoin elsewhere without taking Salvadoran risk and being barely compensated for it. Plus, as economist Frank Muci at the London School of Economics observed on March 16, the bonds will be “governed by El Salvador law, not New York law, which is bad given that President Bukele just packed his country’s supreme court.”

In other words, good luck collecting if the bitcoin bond goes bust.

_________________________________________________________

Mary Anastasia O’Grady is an Opinion Columnist, writes “The Americas,” a weekly column on politics, economics and business in Latin America and Canada that appears every Monday in the Journal. Ms. O’Grady joined the paper in August 1995 and became a senior editorial page writer in December 1999. She was appointed an editorial board member in November 2005. (O’Grady@wsj.com). She is also a member of the board of directors of the Indianapolis­-based Liberty Fund. Energiesnet.com does not necessarily share these views.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), on February 27, 2022.  All comments posted and published on EnergiesNet.com, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of EnergiesNet.com or Petroleumworld.

Original article

Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

EnergiesNet.com 02 28 2022

Share this news
CopyRight©1999-2021, EnergiesNet.com™  / Elio Ohep – All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top