{"id":2648,"date":"2021-12-15T13:29:00","date_gmt":"2021-12-15T13:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/?p=2648"},"modified":"2021-12-21T13:30:46","modified_gmt":"2021-12-21T13:30:46","slug":"amplify-energy-charged-over-californias-worstoil-spill-in-nearly-30-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/amplify-energy-charged-over-californias-worstoil-spill-in-nearly-30-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Amplify Energy charged over California\u2019s worst
oil spill in nearly 30 years<\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

nbcnews.com

California oil cleaning crew<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Burnson \/ Bloomberg News<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LOS ANGELES
Petroleumworld 12 15 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amplify Energy Corp. was charged with criminal negligence in California\u2019s worst oil spill in almost three decades, in which an estimated 25,000 gallons (94,635 liters) of crude oil leaked from a submerged pipeline off the coast of San Diego.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The leak in early October spread a 13-mile (27.4 kilometers) oil slick that fouled beaches and killed wildlife along the Southern California coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A federal grand jury indicted the Houston-based company Wednesday along with two of its units, Beta Operating Co. LLC and San Pedro Bay Pipeline Co., charging them with one misdemeanor count of negligent discharge of oil, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney\u2019s Office in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The companies own and operate the 17 mile-long San Pedro Bay Pipeline. They took more than three hours to plug the leak in the pipeline after a low-pressure alarm sounded in the early morning of Oct. 2, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amplify and its units were negligent in at least six ways, \u201cincluding failing to properly respond to eight separate leak alarms over the span of more than 13 hours and improperly restarting the pipeline that had been shut down following the leak alarms,\u201d according to the U.S. Attorney\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amplify disputed the allegation in a statement Wednesday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The company said its employees took prompt action, investigating what they believed were false leak detection alarms. But the leak detection system wasn\u2019t functioning as designed, Amplify said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It \u201cwas repeatedly and wrongly signaling a potential leak at the platform where no leak could be detected by the platform personnel and where no leak was actually occurring,\u201d the company said. The leak actually occurred more than four miles away, where the pipeline was displaced by a ship\u2019s anchor, according to the company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHad the crew known there was an actual oil spill in the water, they would have shut down the pipeline immediately,\u201d Amplify said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If convicted, the companies could face millions of dollars in fines and be placed on probation for as long as five years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

______________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By Robert Burnson from Bloomberg News

bloomberg.com<\/a>  12 14 2021<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Copyright \u00a91999-2021 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Petroleumworld.com Copyright \u00a92021 Petroleumworld.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

nbcnews.comCalifornia oil cleaning crew By Robert Burnson \/ Bloomberg News LOS ANGELESPetroleumworld 12 15 2021 Amplify Energy Corp. was charged with criminal negligence in California\u2019s worst oil spill in almost three decades, in which an estimated 25,000 gallons (94,635 liters) of crude oil leaked from a submerged pipeline off the coast of San Diego. The …<\/p>\n

Amplify Energy charged over California\u2019s worst
oil spill in nearly 30 years<\/strong><\/span> Leer m\u00e1s »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2650,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"default","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias-diarias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/energiesnet.com\/espanol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}