12/20 Closing Prices / revised 12/20/2024 21:59 GMT |  12/19 OPEC Basket  $72.88 –$0.45 cents 12/20 Mexico Basket (MME) $64.69 +$0.04 cents   11/30 Venezuela Basket (Merey)  $59.58   +$1.28 cents  12/20 NYMEX Light Sweet Crude  $69.46 +$0.08 cents | 12/20 ICE Brent $72.94 -$0.06 cents 12/20 Gasoline RBOB NYC Harbor  $1.942 +1% | 12/20 Heating oil NY Harbor  $2.234 -0.3% | 12/20 NYMEX Natural Gas $3.75 +4.60% | 12/20 Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas) 589 = 0| 12/20 USD/MXN Mexican Peso  $20.0745 (data live) 12/20 EUR/USD Dollar $1.0430 (data live) | 12/23 US/Bs. (Bolivar)  $51.35980000 (data BCV) | Source: WTRG/MSN/Bloomberg/MarketWatch/Reuters

White House Balks at Russian Oil Ban in New Feud With Congress

  • Democrats, Republicans unite behind cutting off Russian oil
  • Biden administration seeks to minimize impact on consumers
An oil delivery point in Sergeevka village, near Ufa, Russia (Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg)

Steven T. Dennis, Jordan Fabian, and Daniel Flatley, Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON
EnergiesNet.com 03 04 2022

The Biden administration’s objections to banning oil imports from Russia puts it at odds with a bipartisan clamor to punish Moscow for the invasion of Ukraine despite the inevitable pain it would cause by sending gasoline prices soaring.

At about the same time another bipartisan bill was introduced to ban Russian energy imports, White House press secretary Jen Psaki warned that choking off the oil flow from Russia would have a global economic impact.

“Our objective and the president’s objective has been to maximize impact on Russia while minimizing impact to us and our allies and partners,” Psaki said at a briefing Thursday. “We don’t have a strategic interest in reducing the global supply of energy, and that would raise prices at the gas pump for the American people, around the world.” 

That, she said, “is certainly a big factor for the president.”

Accelerating inflation has become a top issue for U.S. voters, dragging down President Joe Biden’s approval ratings ahead of midterm elections in which Democrats’ control of the House and Senate is at risk. Yet congressional Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have joined with Republicans in calling for the U.S. to stop paying for Russian oil while the country’s tanks and troops roll across Ukraine.Russia’s War in UkraineKeep up with the latest news and the aftermath of one of the worst security crises in Europe since World War II.EmailSign UpBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Senators Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, and Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, offered the most recent bipartisan proposal. Their legislation would declare a national emergency during which no oil, gas, coal or other fossil fuel could be imported to the U.S. From Russia. The emergency would last at least as long as the invasion continues and could be lifted if there is a substantial change in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s position.

The administration’s position has been they “don’t want to put that on the table,” Murkowski said. “Well, I’m sorry sir, it’s on the table.”

“There should not be a single additional American dollar allowed to finance these atrocities,” she said.

Read More: U.S. Imports of Russian Crude Oil Have Been Dropping for Months

Manchin and Murkowski represent energy-producing states and they back stepping up oil production from domestic sources. But the sentiment for banning Russian imports also includes progressive Democrats such as Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, both of Massachusetts. Markey introduced legislation Tuesday that would ban all imports of Russian crude oil and petroleum products.

“We’re looking for every possible way to strangle the Russian economy,” Warren said in an interview. “It’s a petro-based economy, so cutting off this source of revenue would make Putin hurt. I’m in favor of things that make Putin hurt.”

Unlike Manchin and Republicans, the progressives don’t want Biden to reverse his restrictions on domestic production and pipelines, and want to ramp up a transition away from a carbon-based economy.

Many Republicans have called on Biden this week to act to reopen oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore and to otherwise encourage domestic production. The administration and progressives like Markey note oil companies already sit on many leases they aren’t using and are free to drill more on their own.

There are some senators in both parties who aren’t yet on board with a ban. Mitt Romney of Utah wants to make sure doing so doesn’t simply hurt the U.S. and is coordinated with other countries, because Russia could sell their supplies elsewhere. And Chris Murphy of Connecticut has said that while he’s looking at the issue, it’s very complicated and involves a global commodity.

The average retail price for regular gasoline in the U.S. is $3.728, according to AAA, up from $2.737 a year ago.

When including other petroleum products, like unfinished fuel oil that can be used as a feedstock to produce gasoline and diesel, Russia accounted for about 8% of the U.S.’s 2021 oil imports, though those shipments have also been trending lower in recent months.

Many U.S. refiners had been quietly shifting away from Russian imports even before war broke out. Monroe Energy LLC, the third largest U.S. importer of Russian crude, this week became the latest refiner to eschew oil from Russia, saying it wouldn’t enter into new supply deals “for the foreseeable future.”

— With assistance by Erik Wasson, and Jennifer Epstein

bloomberg.com 03 03 2022

Share this news


 EnergiesNet.com

About Us

 

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas,
Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com


CopyRight©1999-2024, Petroleumworld.com
, EnergiesNet.com™  /
Elio Ohep – All rights reserved
 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the materia

 

Energy - Environment

No posts found!

Point of View

EIA Total Energy Review
This Week in Petroleum