03/26 Closing Prices / revised 03/27/2026 08:09 GMT | 03/26 OPEC Basket  $75.96 +$0.33 cents | 03/26 Mexico Basket (MME) $66.80 +$0.43 cents |   02/28 Venezuela Basket (Merey)  $64.96   -$1.90 cents  03/26 NYMEX Light Sweet Crude  $69.65 +$0.65 cents | 03/26 ICE Brent $73.79 +$0.77 cents  03/26 RBOB  $223.28 +0.21cents | 03/26 USLD  $ 228.87 +2.88 cents | 03/26 NYMEX Natural Gas  $3.861 +0.074 cents | 03/21 Baker Hughes Rig Count (Oil & Gas) 593 +1 | 03/27 USD – Dollar/MXN  20.2429 (data live) 03/27 EUR – USD  $1.0761 (data live)  03/27 US/Bs. (Bolivar)  $69.01880000 (data BCV) Source: WTRG/MSN/Bloomberg/MarketWatch/Reuters

The World Has Been Using A Lot More Oil Than We Thought

Global oil stockpiles are a lot lower than previous estimates suggest.

Emptier than we thought.(SeongJoon Cho/Bloomberg)

By Julian lee

Remember all that missing oil I wrote about last month? The discrepancy between where stockpiles ought to be (based on implied supply and demand balances) and the volumes that had actually been reported or measured?

Well, those barrels are missing no more. As I feared, it turns out they’ve already been used up — in the refineries and petrochemicals plants of China and Saudi Arabia. That means oil balances are a lot tighter than the International Energy Agency previously thought. 

The group published its latest monthly report on Friday, revising its historical oil demand numbers all the way back to 2007. Yes, that’s right, for the past 15 years the world has been using more oil than the primary monitoring agency that advises consumer governments thought.

The IEA has revised 15 years of global oil demandhttps://www.bloomberg.com/toaster/v2/charts/ce7ba7de13ce40ddb8c10a897b1c526f.html?brand=view&webTheme=view&web=true&hideTitles=true

Source: International Energy Agency

The changes aren’t small. At 2.9 billion barrels, the additional demand they’ve just found is equivalent to five times the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or an entire year’s worth of consumption in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the U.K. and Mexico.

Not surprisingly, the revisions were made to oil products and in sectors that are among the least transparent in the oil balance — the petrochemicals industries in Saudi Arabia and China.Sponsored ContentAre Biases Holding Back Successful DIY Trading?Capital

That doesn’t make them unimportant. Petrochemicals is the fastest-growing sector in medium-term oil demand forecasts and it is an area that has seen rapid expansion during the Covid-19 pandemic due to a surge in demand for personal protective equipment and for packaging that has accompanied the boom in online shopping.

The impact on estimates of global oil stockpiles during the pandemic is stark.

The 660 million barrels of surplus stockpiles that the IEA saw a month ago have evaporated. The demand revisions mean that the agency now estimates that global oil stockpiles fell below their end-2019 level by the start of 2022.

And that may not be the end of it. Stockpile data for the OECD countries suggest that there may be more demand revisions to come from the IEA.

Commercial oil inventories among the developed economies of the group’s members fell by 60 million barrels in December, and initial estimates suggest they dropped further last month. That comes in stark contrast to the warnings from Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman that the oil balance would swing from deficit to surplus in the final month of 2021.

That the oil market is still tighter than forecasts indicate won’t come as a huge surprise to those who’ve been following the rise in prices over the past two years. In a remarkable parallel to the oil squeeze of 2007-2008, the path of Brent oil prices has almost exactly matched that of the earlier period during the post-pandemic recovery.

The one significant divergence came after U.S. President Joe Biden threatened, then delivered, a release of oil from the strategic petroleum reserve when the OPEC+ group of oil producers refused to open their taps more quickly. The relief was short-lived, and by the end of January, oil prices were back where they had been at the same point in 2008.

How long they continue on their upward path may depend on whether the U.S. shale patch or a revival of the Iran nuclear deal rides to the rescue.

It has been clear for many months that the OPEC+ group is incapable of adding the supply it keeps promising. The latest analysis from my colleagues at BloombergNEF shows that 15 of the 19 countries with output targets failed to meet them in January. Production by the 13 OPEC countries rose by just 65,000 barrels a day last month — one-quarter of the planned increase.Sponsored ContentA Year After the GameStop Short, Where Is WallStreetBets Now?Capital.com

So the supply is going to have to come from somewhere else. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has been getting steadily more bullish about the shale sector. Earlier this month it raised its domestic production forecast by another 200,000 barrels a day for the second half of 2022 and most of 2023. It now sees production approaching its pre-pandemic peak by the end of next year.Opinion. Data. More Data.Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.EmailSign UpBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

A quicker source of incremental supply might be a return to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal that could rapidly unlock 1.3 million barrels a day of the Persian Gulf country’s production, enough to upend forecasts of oil prices rising above $100 a barrel later this year. The Biden administration says a deal with Iran is now in sight but rapid advances in the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program mean the window for reviving the accord is narrowing.

Without those production boosts, though, the market will have to be brought back into balance by demand destruction. High oil prices, which are helping to stoke inflation, will inevitably start to slow demand growth, but the farther prices rise, the harder they’ll fall.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Julian Lee at jlee1627@bloomberg.net

Julian Lee is an oil strategist for Bloomberg First Word. Previously he worked as a senior analyst at the Centre for Global Energy Studies.@JLeeEnergy Energiesnet.com does not necessarily share these views.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg Opinion, on February 13, 2022. All comments posted and published on EnergiesNet.com, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of EnergiesNet.com or Petroleumworld.

Original article

Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

energiesnet.com 02 14 2022

Share this news

Leave a Comment


 EnergiesNet.com

About Us

 

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas,
Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com


CopyRight©1999-2024, Petroleumworld.com
, EnergiesNet.com™  /
Elio Ohep – All rights reserved
 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the materia

 

Energy - Environment

No posts found!

Point of View

EIA Total Energy Review
This Week in Petroleum