01/14 Closing Prices / revised 01/15/2025 08:15 GMT  01/14 OPEC Basket  $81.25   –$0.47 cents | 01/14 Mexico Basket (MME)  $72.17 –$1.15 cents   11/30 Venezuela Basket (Merey)  $59.58   +$1.28 cents  01/14 NYMEX Light Sweet Crude  $77.50   -$1.32 cents | 01/1ICE Brent  $79.92 -$1.09 cents  01/14 Gasoline RBOB NYC Harbor  $2.10 +0.3%  01/14 Heating oil NY Harbor  $2.53 -0.3% | 01/14 NYMEX Natural Gas $3.97   +0.9%| 01/10 Baker Hughes Rig Count (Oil & Gas) 584 -6 | 01/15 USD/MXN Mexican Peso  $20.5251 (data live) | 01/15 EUR/USD Dollar $1.0315 (data live) | 01/15 US/Bs. (Bolivar)  $53.96420000 (data BCV) | Source: WTRG/MSN/Bloomberg/MarketWatch/Reuters

Angra 3: Brazil’s Nuclear Dilemma

Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion

Brazil’s Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3

Arkady Petrov, The Rio Times

RIO
EnergiesNet.com 01 15 2024

A confidential study by Brazil’s Energy Research Company (EPE) reveals a startling fact: completing the Angra 3 nuclear power plant could cost Brazilian consumers up to R$61.5 billion ($9.92 billion) more on their electricity bills over 40 years.

This finding underscores the complex debate surrounding Brazil’s energy future and the role of nuclear power in meeting growing demand. The Angra 3 project, under construction since 1981, is now at a critical juncture.

With 65% of the work completed, it requires an additional R$23 billion ($3.71 billion) to finish. The study compares Angra 3’s projected energy cost of R$653.31 ($0.11 billion) per Megawatt-hour (MWh) with various alternative energy sources.

Even in the most favorable scenario, comparing Angra 3 to gas-fired thermoelectric plants, consumers would pay R$21.09 billion ($3.40 billion) more over four decades.

Other comparisons show even higher costs, reaching up to R$61.55 billion ($9.93 billion) more than alternative energy sources. Despite these figures, Minister of Mines and Energy Alexandre Silveira supports completing Angra 3.

Brazil's Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion
Brazil’s Nuclear Dilemma: Angra 3 Could Cost Consumers Up to $10 Billion. (Photo Internet reproduction)

The National Energy Policy Council (CNPE) is set to decide on the project’s future, with the EPE study informing this crucial decision. Proponents argue that Angra 3 offers benefits such as zero greenhouse gas emissions, high-skilled job creation, and energy security.

Brazil’s Energy Debate

However, experts question whether these advantages justify the substantial cost to consumers. The debate extends beyond Angra 3 to Brazil’s broader energy strategy.

Electricity demand is projected to grow by 3.5% annually over the next decade. The country faces significant challenges in meeting its energy needs while balancing costs, environmental concerns, and technological advancements.

As Brazil grapples with this decision, the outcome will shape not only the country’s energy landscape but also impact consumer costs and economic development for decades to come.

The Angra 3 project highlights the global challenges of transitioning to sustainable energy sources. It also underscores the complexities of managing economic realities in the process.

riotimesonline.com 01 14 2025

Share this news

Leave a Comment


 EnergiesNet.com

About Us

 

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas,
Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com


CopyRight©1999-2024, Petroleumworld.com
, EnergiesNet.com™  /
Elio Ohep – All rights reserved
 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the materia

 

Energy - Environment

No posts found!

Point of View

EIA Total Energy Review
This Week in Petroleum