01/10 Closing Prices / revised 01/10/2025 21:59 GMT  01/09 OPEC Basket  $76.13 –$0.80 cents | 01/10 Mexico Basket (MME)  $71.46 +$2.65 cents   11/30 Venezuela Basketc (Merey)  $59.58   +$1.28 cents  01/10 NYMEX Light Sweet Crude  $76.56   +$2.65 cents | 01/10 ICE Brent  $79.76 +$2.84 cents |  01/10 Gasoline RBOB NYC Harbor  $2.07 +2.3% 01/10 Heating oil NY Harbor  $2.50 +5.2%| 01/10 NYMEX Natural Gas $3.99   +7.8% | 01/10 Baker Hughes Rig Count (Oil & Gas) 584 -6 | 01/10 USD/MXN Mexican Peso    $20.7161 (data live) | 01/10 EUR/USD Dollar $1.0244 (data live) | 01/14 US/Bs. (Bolivar)  $53.87910000 (data BCV) | Source: WTRG/MSN/Bloomberg/MarketWatch/Reuters

IAEA denounces complacency over safety at the Zaporizhzhia plant after more Russian shelling – NYT

The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, seen from the city of Nikopol in the southern part of Ukraine’s eastern Dnipro region, in October
The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, seen from the city of Nikopol in the southern part of Ukraine’s eastern Dnipro region, in October. (Finbarr O’Reilly for The New York Times)

Matthew Mpoke Bigg and Marc Santora, NYTimes

LONDON
EnergiesNet.com 03 10 2023

The head of the United Nations’ atomic watchdog expressed astonishment on Thursday about international complacency over safety at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in southern Ukraine, where several hours earlier Russian shelling had again cut power to the plant and left workers resorting to using backup generators to maintain safety.

It was the sixth time the Zaporizhzhia facility, Europe’s largest nuclear plant, needed to move to its emergency power supply since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine a year ago, according to Rafael Mariano Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. watchdog. He described the use of generators there as the “last line of defense” against a possible nuclear accident.

In a fiery statement to the agency’s board of governors on Thursday, Mr. Grossi urged immediate action to restore security at the plant, which Russian forces occupied shortly after invading the country a year ago.

“What are we doing?” he said, according to the agency. “How can we sit here in this room this morning and allow this to happen? This cannot go on.” He added, “I am astonished by the complacency.”

“Each time, we are rolling a dice,” Mr. Grossi said, “and if we allow this to continue time after time, then one day our luck will run out.”

The board, which decides policy for the organization, is made up of 35 member states including Russia, according to the agency’s website.

Russian shelling early Thursday cut the external power lines that supply electricity to the plant’s six reactors, according to Ukraine’s state nuclear company, Energoatom. The company said the plant had a supply of diesel to power the generators for 10 days, although the I.A.E.A., which has stationed inspectors at the plant, said there was enough fuel for 15 days.

Bringing additional diesel supplies across the front line in the southern Zaporizhzhia region is extremely difficult, and Energoatom warned of the danger of not having enough power for the facility, whose equipment to prevent a radiation leak requires a constant source of fuel, even with all of the reactors offline.

“If it is impossible to renew the external power supply of the station during this time, an accident with radiation consequences for the whole world may occur,” the company said on Telegram.

External power to the plant was last cut off in November, Mr. Grossi said. Each time the power source to the plant has been severed, engineers have raced to make repairs before the plant’s 18 diesel generators run out of fuel. International nuclear inspectors have repeatedly called the situation unsustainable and precarious.

The U.N. atomic agency has spent months trying to forge an agreement between Moscow and Kyiv to establish a safety and security zone around the plant. But Ukraine’s energy minister said this week that talks were at a dead end because Russia had refused his government’s demand to withdraw from the plant and hand control of it back to Energoatom. Moscow has placed the plant under the control of its own state nuclear company, Rosatom.

The predawn shelling on Thursday came as Russia launched missile and drone attacks across Ukraine as part of a monthslong campaign to damage the country’s power infrastructure.

Since Moscow’s troops began occupying the Zaporizhzhia facility, it has been hit by rocket fire, which at one point damaged an area where spent nuclear fuel is stored. There have also been multiple reports of shells landing in and near the plant’s grounds. Russian forces have also set up machine-gun posts at the plant, Energoatom said this week.

The Ukrainian authorities say that some of the Ukrainian workers who remain there have been interrogated and that at least one had been killed by Russian forces.

Matthew Mpoke Bigg is a correspondent covering international news. He previously worked as a reporter, editor and bureau chief for Reuters and did postings in Nairobi, Abidjan, Atlanta, Jakarta and Accra. 

Marc Santora is the International News Editor based in London, focusing on breaking news events. He was previously the Bureau Chief for East and Central Europe based in Warsaw. He has also reported extensively from Iraq and Africa. @MarcSantoraNYT

nytimes.co 03 09 2023

Share this news

Leave a Comment


 EnergiesNet.com

About Us

 

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas,
Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com


CopyRight©1999-2024, Petroleumworld.com
, EnergiesNet.com™  /
Elio Ohep – All rights reserved
 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the materia

 

Energy - Environment

No posts found!

Point of View

EIA Total Energy Review
This Week in Petroleum