12/13 Closing Prices / revised 12/12/2024 21:59 GMT |  12/12 OPEC Basket $73.36 +$0.91 cents 12/13 Mexico Basket (MME)  $66.23 +$1.02 cents   10/30 Venezuela Basket (Merey) $58.30   +$3.39 cents  12/13 NYMEX Light Sweet Crude  $71.29 +$1.27 cents | 12/13 ICE Brent  $74.44 +$1.08 cents | 12/13 Gasoline RBOB NYC Harbor  $2.0 +0.07 % | 12/13 Heating oil NY Harbor  $2.27 +0.05 % | 12/13 NYMEX Natural Gas   $3.28 -5.1% | 12/13  Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas)  589 + 7 | 12/13 USD/MXN Mexican Peso $20.1257 (data live) 12/13 EUR/USD Dollar  $1.0501 (data live) | 12/16 US/Bs. (Bolivar)  $50.33190000 (data BCV) | Source: WTRG/MSN/Bloomberg/MarketWatch/Reuters

We Need Fusion Energy to Advance Our Climate Endgame – Sabine Hossenfelder / NYTimes

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm announcing that experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory had for the first time achieved ignition, in which fusion energy generated equaled or exceeded the laser energy that started the reaction
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm announcing that experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory had for the first time achieved ignition, in which fusion energy generated equaled or exceeded the laser energy that started the reaction.( Chip Somodevilla / Getty )

By Sabine Hossenfelder

On Dec. 5, 192 lasers at the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California fired a synchronized shot at a golden cylinder about the size of a jelly bean. With exquisite precision, the capsule focused the laser light on a grain of frozen hydrogen. For a fraction of a second, the temperature in the hydrogen exceeded that in the core of our sun, forcing the nuclei of the hydrogen atoms to merge with each other.

Scientists measure progress in these experiments by comparing the energy put into the reaction to the energy that comes out. At NIF there was a net gain when 2.05 megajoules of energy became 3.15 megajoules on the other end. For the first time, we have indisputable evidence that the lasers released nuclear energy from the fuel under controlled laboratory conditions.

Senator Charles Schumer of New York declared the breakthrough propitious, saying in a statement, “This astonishing scientific advance puts us on the precipice of a future no longer reliant on fossil fuels but instead powered by new clean fusion energy.”

But we won’t have fusion from lasers anytime soon because the lasers are terribly inefficient: They require about 300 megajoules to fire a shot — enough to power the average American home for three days. To be commercially relevant, the efficiency would have to improve dramatically, the reaction would have to be repeated at rapid sequence and the targets would have to be manufactured at low cost in large numbers.

Given that it will likely be decades until we can power the electricity grid with fusion energy, it is fair to ask whether we should even consider this to be good news for the climate. Katharine Hayhoe, a Texas Tech climate scientist, said that it isn’t. “We already have the technologies we need to decarbonize 80 percent of the electricity sector by 2030,” she tweeted.

Proving that it’s possible to release energy from fusion in a laboratory will neither meet our immediate need to reduce carbon emissions nor help us control the damage we have already done to the climate. But we have to think beyond our present task of net zero — cutting emissions to as close to zero as possible.

The decision to ramp up investment into fusion in the wake of this breakthrough is ultimately a question of how much we value the lives of future generations. Wind and solar energy often require large installations that take up huge swaths of land (with the exception of offshore wind). Moreover, solar and wind work better in some parts of the world than in others. Much of Europe is considerably farther north than the United States and gets less sunlight during the winter. Most of us in Europe also don’t live on an island that we can surround with wind farms.

Nuclear power — including fusion — is a way to generate a huge amount of power in a small space. That’s a major advantage in a world with already intense pressures on a finite amount of land; future generations deserve a shot at this form of relief.

Nuclear fusion is a costly enterprise, no doubt. Expenses for the NIF total $3.5 billion so far. Other similar projects in the works are expected to eat up more than $20 billion. But in the past decade, it has also attracted the interest of private investors. After the NIF breakthrough, it will likely draw billions of dollars more in funding from both private and public sectors.

Richard Black, a former BBC correspondentcautioned on Twitter that generating power from nuclear fusion, even if technically feasible, “might prove prohibitively expensive.” By the time the technology is ripe for commercial application, he said, “many countries will already have virtually removed fossil fuels from their power system. And there will be no point, 15 years after that, in replacing clean and extremely cheap renewables with clean and probably expensive fusion.”

The possibility that we will have mostly decarbonized our economies by the time nuclear fusion becomes commercially viable is not a given. The solar and wind projects we’re building now must be accompanied by sufficient energy storage, and we are nowhere near the capacity we need to scale up these energy sources. It’s also possible that nations will choose to invest more in nuclear fission, which is used in today’s nuclear power plants, to phase out fossil fuels.

Neither nuclear fusion nor nuclear fission releases carbon dioxide. Both can produce vast amounts of energy from small volumes of fuel. But unlike fission, fusion does not create long-lived radioactive waste. Since fusion does not lend itself to runaway reactions or nuclear proliferation, it is reasonable to expect that it will be less expensive than nuclear fission power, once the technology is mature.

Material science, computing and artificial intelligence are all contributing to making nuclear fusion more energy efficient. Much as how robots can suddenly walk after toppling over for decades, it will become practical not because of one big breakthrough, but by countless incremental improvements.

In the weeks to come, scientists will want to know whether NIF’s success was a one-shot miracle or can be reliably reproduced. But we now have a vibrant international community of researchers, engineers and investors who are pushing nuclear fusion technology forward.

Investing in nuclear fusion now will not make the next few decades of an accelerating climate crisis any easier. But after all the damage that our short-term thinking has done to this planet, let us think past 2050, and show our children that we care.

_________________________________________________________________________

Sabine Hossenfelder is a physicist, an author and a producer of the YouTube channel Science Without the Gobbledygook. She works at the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy. Energiesnet.com does not necessarily share these views.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published by The New York Times-NYT on December 16, 2022. A version of this article appears in print on Dec. 2, 2022, Section A, Page 23 of the New York edition with the headline: Blockchains: What Are They Good For?. EnergiesNet.com reproduces this article in the interest of our readers. All comments posted and published on EnergiesNet.com, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of EnergiesNet.com or Petroleumworld.

Original article

Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of socially, environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

EnergiesNet.com 12 20 2022

Share this news

Support EnergiesNet.com

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas, Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com


CopyRight©1999-2021, EnergiesNet.com™  / Elio Ohep – All rights reserved
 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.