11/29 Closing prices / revised 11/30/2023  08:05 GMT 11/29    OPEC Basket    83.89 +0.49 | 11/29    Mezcla Mexicana de Exportación   Mexico Basket (MME)   $74.39  +1.37  | 10/31     Venezuela Basket (Merey)  $72.54  – 3.00  (Source: Economia Hoy)  | 11/29    NYMEX WTI Texas Intermediate January CLF24   $77.86 +1.45    | 11/29    ICE Brent January  BRNF24   $83.10   +1.42  | 11/29    NYMEX Gasoline December  RBZ23    $2.28   +2.4% | 11/29     NYMEX  Heating Oil  December HOZ23   $2.89  -0.6% | 11/29     Natural Gas January NGF24    $2.80 -1.2%  | 11/22    Active U.S. Rig Count (Oil & Gas)    622     +4    | 11/30     USD/MXN Mexican Peso  17.2702 (data live  | 11/30   EUR/USD    1.0954  (data live)  | 11/30    US/Bs. (Bolivar)   $35.49390000  ( data BCV)    |      

PDVSA’s Citgo-backed bonds are invalid, Venezuela opposition tells NY court – Reuters

PDVSA's Citgo-backed bonds are invalid, Venezuela opposition tells NY court - Reuters
Marco Bello/Reuters

Luc Cohen, Reuters

EnergiesNet.com 04 04 2023

 Lawyers for Venezuelan state-owned oil company Petroleos de Venezuela argued to New York state’s highest court that the company’s bonds backed by a majority stake in refiner Citgo Petroleum Corp are not valid.

Venezuela’s opposition has controlled PDVSA’s U.S. assets including Citgo since 2019, due to sanctions on President Nicolas Maduro’s socialist government. The move in court is part of the opposition’s push to prevent creditors from taking over Houston-based Citgo, the eighth-largest U.S. refiner which last year processed some 811,000 barrels per day of crude oil.

Sanctions block bondholders from taking Citgo through April 20. While the U.S. government has renewed that measure several times when past deadlines approached, the most recent extension was for just three months, which could signal a policy shift.

PDVSA defaulted on bonds maturing in 2020, which were backed by a 50.1% stake in Citgo Holding Inc, a Delaware-registered entity through which PDVSA owns Citgo.

Venezuela’s opposition filed suit in Manhattan federal court, arguing the bonds were invalid because the approval of the South American country’s congress was needed to pledge Citgo as collateral. The National Assembly, controlled by the opposition when the bonds were issued in 2016, rejected the plan.

“This court should…reject the invitation to transform New York State…into a safe haven for unscrupulous authoritarian regimes to execute illegal transactions that violate their own constitutions,” lawyers for PDVSA wrote in a filing with the Albany-based New York State Court of Appeals.

PDVSA’s argument, filed on March 27, was not immediately made available on the court’s website.

The bondholders are due to reply by May 12. They have argued that the contention the bonds were illegal under Venezuelan law has no bearing in New York, where the bonds were issued.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla initially sided with the bondholders. But the Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later said a section of New York state’s commercial code could be interpreted as implying that validity of a security, such as a bond, is determined by the local law of the jurisdiction where it is issued.

That court asked the New York State Court of Appeals to consider the question. (Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by David Gregorio)

reuters.com 04 03 2023

Share this news

Support EnergiesNet.com

By Elio Ohep · Launched in 1999 under Petroleumworld.com

Information & News on Latin America’s Energy, Oil, Gas, Renewables, Climate, Technology, Politics and Social issues

Contact : editor@petroleuworld.com

CopyRight©1999-2021, EnergiesNet.com™  / Elio Ohep – All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.

Scroll to Top